Without transcribing the whole video, I can simply say that Holland describes his collaborations with professional scientists, and as these people were professionals, they presumably knew how to do experiments. This is essentially the identical effect observed by Royal Rife, except explained in modern scientific terms, complete with equations showing how this works.Ĭlick to expand.Within the first minute of the TEDx video, Holland makes it clear that he was working with a number of university scientists from the very beginningĪt 1:25 into the video, Holland says, "The scientists said, 'You're killing more cancer cells than if you had used radiation!' That same scientist went on, 'If you had spent millions of dollars developing a new drug that killed this many cancer cells, it would be a home run.'" Holland's background as a music professor came in handy here, as he himself alludes to in the video.Īs for following Rife's theory about vibrating cells, please see the section in the paper that is entitled, "Microtubule mechanical resonance model". Nobody else uses harmonics in this way - not even Rife. As Holland mentions in the video, the only difference between his machine and a standard Rife-Bare machine is that the RF carrier wave was made tunable it is set to the 11th harmonic of the base frequency. Holland and his collaborators call his machine a Rife-Bare machine, and that's what it is. This enables the machine to have a more powerful effect against microorganisms. Comparing Holland's machine to Pasche's, you can see that Holland's is more flexible, as Holland is the only one in the field to use frequency harmonics. The advantages of Holland's machine are made clear. Holland's machine and technique (and in the end, they are his, as you will find if you do the research) are also compared to the TTF machine that Hip described earlier. The paper I linked to in my previous post is a fascinating paper, and I would highly recommend reading it. I do not understand why you are not looking at the evidence, especially since it is being provided to you right here in this thread. If you want to be scientific, you need to look at the evidence before drawing conclusions. So will a casual reading of the paper I linked to in my previous post. Click to expand.This is incorrect even a casual viewing of Holland's video will show this.
0 kommentar(er)
